12 C Group 2 - Accident
Explain the story
of your video
In my continuity sequence Kristina walks out of a lift and
walks down a corridor whilst texting and because she is too preoccupied with
her phone, she has an accident when she walks into a door.
How did you
attempt to create narrative flow?
We tried to create narrative flow by showing Kristina
walking from the lift, through the corridor and eventually crashing a door
through different angles but as if it was taken on multiple cameras at once.
We also used a range of different shot types but in a
logical order to mimic the characters journey through the corridor and then to
the accident, this contributed greatly to the smooth narrative flow.
Our use of the 30 degree rule in shot 3 & 4 also enhanced the creative flow as the transition between the shot seemed to flow, if we had not taken the 30 degree rule into consideration, the transition would have appeared very jumpy.
We also stuck to the 180 degree rule when filming Kristina walking, as the camera only appeared on the left of her or in front or behind her it meant that the audience were not confused by the location of Kristina in relation to the camera. If we had gone on her right side, we would have broken the rule and viewer may not have been able to make sense of the scene.
Did you achieve
full continuity?
No, we did do quite well but some of our shots were too long
for them to appear naturally continuous, for example the first shot of Kristina
walking out of the lift and saying "sorry" to Tom, was too long as
the shot should have finished immediately as Kristina walked out of shot or
even just before.
In the shots of the corridor, one of the doors that Kristina
eventually bumps into is open but in the shot where she actually bumps into it,
they are closed. That is a small change that we can make next time to enhance
narrative flow.
In hindsight, what
would you do differently to improve the narrative flow of your video and tell
your story more effectively?
I would make sure that all of the shot lengths were very accurate;
this would mean that all of the shots would correctly flow into each other, which
in turn would improve continuity and narrative flow.
I would also use different shot types as I felt some of the
shots I used, for example the first two shots that showed Kristina's feet and
legs were too confusing, this in turn inhibited the narrative flow.
I would also have swapped the order of shot 4 & 5 as it would make the transition from shot 3 appear much smoother although because we did stick to the 30 degree rule, it was smooth anyway.
I would also have swapped the order of shot 4 & 5 as it would make the transition from shot 3 appear much smoother although because we did stick to the 30 degree rule, it was smooth anyway.
No comments:
Post a Comment